Themes for Crooked Wings
TODO:
-add/remove/edit elements on the document
-WEIGH elements on the document
-how can the protagonists and other characters push these elements?
-how can events and choices push these elements?
Frequency is roughly done as a percentage score but that's not very necessary
STATEMENT | IMPORTANCE | FREQUENCY | DIRECTNESS | Q&T notes (to process) |
ideals that stray from reality can no longer be meaningfully applied | Much More Important | 30 | Very Direct | |
socioeconomic class is not divinely (or morally) fated | Much More Important | 15 | Direct | |
mental health IS health | More Important | 25 | A Little Direct | |
your worth transcends a paycheck | Important | 8 | A Little Subtle | |
"free" unregulated markets allow actors with power to limit freedoms of others | Less Important | 18 | Subtle | |
passing down wealth without property taxes (??) | Much Less Important | 4 | A Little Direct | |
QUESTION | IMPORTANCE | FREQUENCY | DIRECTNESS | Q&T Notes (to process) |
when can an individual throw up their hands and say 'this is not my problem'? | Much More Important | 13 | Very Direct | THIS. I think this is one of the strongest parts of your story: complicated calculation of "should I act". heroism vs. complicity. |
the real enemy isn't some individual person as much as it is 'institutions and |
More Important | 42 | A Little Subtle | |
How does one want their society to react to 'disabled' people? | Important | 20 | Direct | |
WHAT'S WITH PRIVATE PROPERTY, ANYWAY?! property as refuge property as 'I can kick you out' property as 'I get access to the resources here' |
Important | 8 | Direct | I have a podcast for you on this: It's the socialism series by Matt Breunig. Podcast is the Breunigs. In fact his writing might be the best guide to property arguments. (I'll give away the end: It's philosophically indefensible, if you're premises are "liberty" or "utility" or "just desserts"...We can talk more. |
what is the difference between luxuries and goods? | Less Important | 5 | A Little Direct | It depends what you mean by luxuries and by goods. Anything bought and sold on the marketplace can be a commodity. Even a luxury good. It follows commodity logic. (https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/commodity.htm) Where non-luxury commodities differ from luxury is in how they are priced, and how they are viewed. |
IN A CAPITALIST ENVIRONMENT: is the literal possession of money/capital INHERENTLY not-good? [does the money corrupt them?] | Less Important | 3 | Subtle | Yes. Bad. Accumulation of wealth bad...for an individual or cadre. For the public, accumulation is quite good. Can't have bridges without accumulation. |
What is 'disability'? | Much Less Important | 6 | A Little Direct | I like this. I don't know how to answer. |
'usury' might be a useful financial technology, but... | Much Less Important | 2 | A Little Subtle | The interesting thing about usury, is it is NOT a positive technology. At a certain level of debt in the population, return on investment goes to zero anyway. That's why Jubilee. |
Is property theft? | Much Less Important | 1 | Very Subtle | Yes. But whyyyyy? |
THEME | IMPORTANCE | FREQUENCY | DIRECTNESS | Q&T notes (to process) |
Satirical humor | Much More Important | 19 | Direct | |
ABSURD/SLAPSTICK HUMOR | Much More Important | 35 | Very Direct | |
moral complexity! | Important | 21 | A Little Subtle? | |
exploring how institutions influence and coerce individuals | Less Important | 15 | Moderate? | |
you just know that some things are right (slavery was bad) [HEROISM] | Much Less Important | 10 | Subtle? | |
...do 'themes' need to be ranked ordinally with each other?
Unsorted notes:
-people second-guess themselves about their difficulties?
Q NOTE ABOUT CAPITALISM AS AN INSTITUTION: 'This question is CRUCIAL. Unfortunately, I don't believe it actually has much depth, as a question. What makes it interesting, to me, is that our society tends to view problems with Capitalism itself, as problems with institutions not working as they should.
My firm position is that institutional rot is never the deep problem within capitalism. The problem is that "rot" is built in. Take Wall Street circa 2008....Can we say that it was institutional rot, or that the institutions were functioning as they tend to function over time? So, I would say that all the things that LOOK like institutional rot are in fact features of the whole system. There is no parallel universe with an ethical wall street, or even one where there aren't giant devastating crashes. Capitalism is fueled by disaster. '
EXEMPLIFICATION SPREADSHEET
CHARACTER(trait) OR INTERACTION OR EVENT OR STORY-FEATURE OR GAME MECHANIC OR DESIGN-FEATURE | THEME||QUESTION||STATEMENT TO EXEMPLIFY | HOW IT IS DONE | Q&T notes (to process) |
Veezal's problems with ADHD | 'What is 'disability'?' | ||
Kaiyara's problems with depression and burnout | 'What is 'disability'?' and 'mental health IS health' | ||
Zelrik's problems with being exiled and physical malformations | 'What is 'disability'?' | ||
Tawnette's problems with aphasia | 'What is 'disability'?' | ||
STORY BEAT: Veezal, Kaiyara, Zelrik, and Tawnette's reacting to the plight of the blue-collar workers by saying 'if we don't help them, who will?' | 'when can an individual throw up their hands and say 'this is not my problem'?' | ||
Sedrin's wariness of how slow institutions are to change (which leads him to erroneously pessimistic conclusions) | 'ideals that stray from reality can no longer be meaningfully applied' AND 'moral complexity!' | ||
Salamin's zeal and connection to the emotions of popular (which leads him to erroneously theory-driven conclusions) | 'ideals that stray from reality can no longer be meaningfully applied' AND 'moral complexity!' | ||
Rrajak's promotion to a leadership role due to his excellence in engineering, in spite of his lack of interest (and incompetence) in management | 'Satirical humor' | ||
Lornix's ??? | |||
Pryden's ??? | |||
Kechi's extreme distrust of civic government power | 'moral complexity!' | ||
Ahamefula's interest in not losing his job so he can buy his disabled son a good life | 'when can an individual throw up their hands and say 'this is not my problem'?' AND 'moral complexity!' | ||
Onyeka's buying in to a system that does not benefit her. | |||
Khanda's disinterest in moral harm, compared to his own financial interests | |||
Zikora's complete disinterest in shame or guilt | |||
Arudow's lack of interest in asking tough questions | |||
Vritak's enormous, spherical body | 'ABSURD/SLAPSTICK HUMOR' | ||
Gritak's lack of speaking in full sentences, instead screeching inarticulately in rage | 'ABSURD/SLAPSTICK HUMOR' | ||
Tomil's ??? | |||
Alondr's ??? | |||
Jiwa's ??? | |||
Huitzi's ??? | |||
Zephyx's ??? | |||
GAME MECHANIC: During the night cycle, different resources (such as 'attention from corporations', 'morale', 'sanity', 'exhaustion') can be exchanged for others | 'moral complexity!' | ||
DESIGN-FEATURE: Chasing one 'ending' (either extreme anarchy or extreme change-within-the-existing-system) results in not achieving the explicit goal | 'moral complexity!' AND 'ideals that stray from reality can no longer be meaningfully applied' | ||
STORY-FEATURE: The public understands the flourishing of Blight Elementals as an unfortunate consequence of Violet Fulgurite production. However, the truth of the matter is that a nonzero amount of industrialists and politicians find this 'unfortunate thing' as an actual boon. | '"free" unregulated markets allow actors with power to limit freedoms of others' | is idea may have been jettisoned. I'm not sure. If not, I think it could be a good vector for exploring your themes. This touches on the institutional rot question. This is also a great historical reference. Many of the things that people have seen as unintended by capitalism are, in fact, intended...or at least the worst things are ignored. Homelessness, alcoholism, war environmental disaster.... | |
(repeats of any item in the spreadsheet are okay)
Link to general theme page