Themes for Crooked Wings
TODO:
-add/remove/edit elements on the document
-WEIGH elements on the document
-how can the protagonists and other characters push these elements?
-how can events and choices push these elements?
Frequency is roughly done as a percentage score but that's not very necessary
| STATEMENT | IMPORTANCE | FREQUENCY | DIRECTNESS | |||
| "free" unregulated markets allow actors with power to limit freedoms of others | Less Important | |||||
| your worth transcends a paycheck | More Important | A Little Subtle | ||||
| socioeconomic class is not divinely (or morally) fated | Much More Important | Direct | ||||
| passing down wealth without property taxes (??) | Much Less Important | A Little Direct | ||||
| ? | This idea may have been jettisoned. I'm not sure. If not, I think it could be a good vector for exploring your themes. This touches on the institutional rot question. This is also a great historical reference. Many of the things that people have seen as unintended by capitalism are, in fact, intended...or at least the worst things are |
| QUESTION | IMPORTANCE | FREQUENCY | DIRECTNESS | Q Notes |
| 'usury' might be a useful financial technology, but... | Much Less Important | 2 | A Little Subtle | The interesting thing about usury, is it is NOT a positive technology. At a certain level of debt in the population, return on investment goes to zero anyway. That's why Jubilee. |
| WHAT'S WITH PRIVATE PROPERTY, ANYWAY?! property as refuge property as 'I can kick you out' property as 'I get access to the resources here' |
Important | 8 | Direct | I have a podcast for you on this: It's the socialism series by Matt Breunig. Podcast is the Breunigs. In fact his writing might be the best guide to property arguments. (I'll give away the end: It's philosophically indefensible, if you're premises are "liberty" or "utility" or "just desserts"...We can talk more. |
| what is the difference between luxuries and goods? | Less Important | 5 | A Little Direct | It depends what you mean by luxuries and by goods. Anything bought and sold on the marketplace can be a commodity. Even a luxury good. It follows commodity logic. (https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/commodity.htm) Where non-luxury commodities differ from luxury is in how they are priced, and how they are viewed. |
| the real enemy isn't some individual person as much as it is INSTITUTIONAL ROT? | More Important | 42 | A Little Subtle |
This question is CRUCIAL. Unfortunately, I don't believe it actually has much depth, as a question. What makes it interesting, to me, is that our society tends to view problems with Capitalism itself, as problems with institutions not working as they should. My firm position is that institutional rot is never the deep problem within capitalism. The problem is that "rot" is built in. Take Wall Street circa 2008....Can we say that it was institutional rot, or that the institutions were functioning as they tend to function over time? So, I would say that all the things that LOOK like institutional rot are in fact features of the whole system. There is no parallel universe with an ethical wall street, or even one where there aren't giant devastating crashes. Capitalism is fueled by disaster. |
| IN A CAPITALIST ENVIRONMENT: is the literal possession of money/capital INHERENTLY not-good? [does the money corrupt them?] | Less Important | 3 | Subtle | Yes. Bad. Accumulation of wealth bad...for an individual or cadre. For the public, accumulation is quite good. Can't have bridges without accumulation. |
| Is property theft? | Much Less Important | 1 | Very Subtle | Yes. But whyyyyy? |
| What is 'disability'? | Much Less Important | 6 | A Little Direct | I like this. I don't know how to answer. |
| How does one want their society to react to 'disabled' people? | Important | 20 | Direct | |
| when can an individual throw up their hands and say 'this is not my problem'? | Much More Important | 13 | Very Direct | THIS. I think this is one of the strongest parts of your story: complicated calculation of "should I act". heroism vs. complicity. |
| THEME | IMPORTANCE | FREQUENCY | DIRECTNESS |
| ABSURD/SLAPSTICK HUMOR | Much More Important | 35 | Very Direct |
| Satirical humor | Much More Important | 19 | Direct |
| exploring how institutions influence and coerce individuals | Less Important | 15 | Moderate? |
| you just know that some things are right (slavery was bad) [HEROISM] | Much Less Important | 10 | Subtle? |
| moral complexity! |
Important | 21 | A Little Subtle? |
...do 'themes' need to be ranked ordinally with each other?
Unsorted notes:
-people second-guess themselves about their difficulties? -institutions cause static: GAS GAS GAS vs instutitional static -COMPROMISE (when)
EXEMPLIFICATION SPREADSHEET
| CHARACTER OR INTERACTION OR EVENT |
HOW IT IS DONE | ||
| Veezal | |||
| Kaiyara | |||
| Zelrik | |||
| Tawnette | |||
| The unleashing of demons is seen as an unintended consequence of Violet Fulgurite |
|||
(repeats of any item in the spreadsheet are okay)Night Cycle Action names; Boots on the Ground Socializing! Take a Nap Lay Low with the Enemy Spanners in the Gears! WE RIOT!!
Link to general theme page